Abstract

BackgroundBrucellosis is endemic in many areas in China. The current diagnosis of Brucellosis predominantly relies on the traditional bacterial culture and serum agglutination test. In this study, we aimed to explore the value of ELISA in the diagnosis of Brucellosis in Chinese population.MethodsWe recruited 235 patients with a diagnosis of Brucellosis at different clinical stages: 117 in acute, 78 in subacute, and 40 in chronic. We also recruited 248 control patients who presented with similar clinical symptoms but with a different diagnosis other than Brucellosis. In addition, 90 healthy volunteers were also recruited. Bacterial culture, agglutination test and ELISA assay were performed to detect Brucella spp.ResultsAmong 235 patients with Brucellosis, 51 (21.7%) was positive for bacterial culture, 150 (63.8%) were positive by agglutination test, and 232 (98.7%) were positive by ELISA (IgG and/or IgM). When we stratified the patients based on the disease stages (acute, subacute and chronic), ELISA was the most sensitive method and showed a highest positive rate in all stages. By Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve analysis of ELISA results, we found that measurement of IgG level was superior to measurement of IgM level (AUC, 0.993 versus 0.877). Since the measurement of IgG itself missed rare cases in acute phase, we recommended measuring IgG and IgM simultaneously by ELISA for the diagnosis of Brucellosis. In term of the specificity of ELISA in the diagnosis of Brucellosis, our study showed that only 1.6% (4/248) non-Brucellosis patients were positive by ELISA; all positive cases were IgM only and none showed positive IgG. Similar results were found in healthy volunteers. In summary, our study concluded that ELISA is the most sensitive and specific method to detect Brucellosis in Chinese population.ConclusionsELISA assay is sensitive, fast, and convenient to detect Brucellosis. It shows the high sensitivity and specifity and should be used as a routine lab test when Brucellosis is suspected in clinical practice.

Highlights

  • Brucellosis is endemic in many areas in China

  • We aimed to evaluate the value of Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the diagnosis of Brucellosis and compared it to the assays currently used in clinical practice

  • The diagnosis of Brucellosis was based on the proper clinical context, including history, clinical presentation and laboratory studies as well as at least one of the following results being positive: bacterial culture, agglutination test or ELISA test

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Brucellosis is endemic in many areas in China. Brucellosis, called Mediterranean fever, is zoonotic infectious disease caused by Brucella spp. It infects humans as well as animals such as sheep, cattle, goats, pigs, and dogs. In China, the occurrence rate of Brucellosis has increased significantly since 1990s and it gradually becomes one of the most prevalent infectious diseases. Northern China is the main endemic area [6]. In addition to China, many other areas such as the Mediterranean Basin, Mexico, Eastern Europe, Africa and the Middle East are at high risk for Brucellosis. Given the high prevalence of Brucellosis, a rapid and reliable test for the diagnosis is necessary

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call