Abstract

Sputum often contains large amounts of contaminating bacterial DNA that, if not eliminated during RNA isolation, may interfere with gene expression studies. During RNA isolation only repeated DNase treatment can effectively remove contaminating bacterial DNA from samples, but this compromises RNA quality. In this study we tested alternative methods to facilitate the removal of DNA and improve the quality of RNA obtained. Sputum samples obtained from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were processed with dithiothreitol and subjected to various RNA isolation methods, yet with modified protocols. Modifications included prolonged DNase treatment or vortexing of sputum cells in the presence of beads prior to RNA isolation. Bacterial DNA contamination was tested by PCR using universal bacterial primers, while RNA quality was assessed by real-time PCR using GAPDH primers for amplicons of different length. We found that the RNeasy Plus Mini kit equipped with the gDNA eliminator spin column was able to completely eliminate bacterial DNA, if sputum cells were lysed in the presence of bashing beads. Notably, compared with the standard protocol, the modified procedure yielded better quality RNA as well, as indicated by improved threshold profiles of qPCR. Bead vortexing of cells was less effective when combined with other RNA isolation methods, and the repeated DNase treatment needed to completely remove contaminating DNA from the samples reduced the quality of RNA markedly. Bead vortexing in combination with certain RNA extraction methods greatly facilitates the isolation of sputum RNA that is free of contaminating bacterial DNA, and is suitable for downstream applications.

Highlights

  • Sputum is a valuable source of cells, proteins, lipids, nucleic acids and oxidative products, and it is an ideal sample for studying lung physiology [1,2,3,4]

  • An integral part of the study protocol was to check for the presence of contaminating bacterial DNA in the isolated sputum RNA

  • PCR using universal bacterial primers was the method of choice and for this to be informative we had to make sure that no exogenous bacterial DNA was introduced during cDNA synthesis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sputum is a valuable source of cells, proteins, lipids, nucleic acids and oxidative products, and it is an ideal sample for studying lung physiology [1,2,3,4]. Sputum as a clinical sample is often preferable over blood, as it is lung-specific, while blood contains a mixture of signature markers of several pathophysiological processes unfolding simultaneously in a patient [8]. The ubiquitous presence of bacteria in sputum samples aggravates the problems even further

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.