Elimination of 24-Hour Call Shifts in an Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Training Program [ID: 1375098

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Resident duty hour restrictions have resulted in improved resident safety with mixed results on patient safety. There are limited data about 24-hour shifts in obstetrics and gynecology. This project studies resident wellness and performance after eliminating 24-hour call shifts. METHODS: This is a preliminary analysis of a quality improvement project. Physicians were surveyed before and after implementation of a call schedule that reduced 24-hour shifts to 14-hour shifts. Resident performance was assessed by self-reported and attending-reported ability to perform tasks. RESULTS: At preintervention survey, 13 out of 16 residents and 8 out of 17 attendings favored eliminating 24-hour call shifts. Attendings had more confidence in residents' performance on 24-hour shifts than residents did (P<.02) when stratified by task and residency year. At 3-month follow-up, all residents (19/19) preferred 14-hour shifts. Residents reported improvements in wellness (13/13), sleep (13/13), and burnout (10/13). Residents felt more confident in their ability to perform a vaginal delivery (11/13), cesarean birth (12/13), or communicate effectively (11/13) with 14-hour compared to 24-hour shifts. Thematic analysis showed that residents felt happier and better able to care for patients. Two residents cited improved ability to learn, while only one resident cited lost learning opportunities. CONCLUSION: Data suggest that obstetrics and gynecology residency programs should eliminate 24-hour shifts to improve resident wellness and performance, while decreasing burnout. Final follow-up data (to be collected March 2023) will assess whether attendings see a change in resident performance.