Abstract

The eligibility screening step of a systematic review or systematic map (sometimes referred to as ‘study selection’, ‘evidence selection’ or ‘inclusion screening’) determines the scope of the evidence that may answer the review or map question. Eligibility screening involves the development, testing and application of eligibility criteria (inclusion and exclusion criteria) by an evidence synthesis review team, based on methods pre-specified in the review or map protocol. Some parts of the process require judgement, meaning that consistent and transparent reporting of the eligibility criteria and the process for applying them are essential in order to reduce the risk of introducing errors or bias. The existing Collaboration for Environmental Evidence (CEE) Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in Environmental Management (version 4.2, March 2013) give relatively limited guidance on how to conduct eligibility screening. In this paper we provide more in-depth information on good practice methods for this step of evidence synthesis, based on a critical consideration of existing guidance and current practice. Our aim is to provide recommendations to support those conducting CEE systematic reviews or systematic maps for environmental management questions; however, the methods we describe are generic and should be broadly applicable across a wide range of environmental research topics.

Highlights

  • Systematic reviews follow a structured process in order to answer specific questions whilst minimising the risks of errors or bias [1,2,3,4]

  • The present paper goes beyond providing a summary of existing guidance and practice; we indicate where current practice in eligibility screening in environmental evidence synthesis could be further improved to reduce the risks of introducing errors or bias

  • Summary and recommendations The eligibility screening step of a systematic review or systematic map is a well-structured process that determines which evidence will be available for answering a systematic review or systematic map question

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Systematic reviews follow a structured process in order to answer specific questions whilst minimising the risks of errors or bias [1,2,3,4]. Systematic maps follow a structured process, to determine the extent and characteristics of a specified evidence base, but provide answers which are more descriptive [5] These approaches to evidence synthesis have different objectives, they both need to identify all information relevant to the questions they are addressing, so as to reduce the risk of selective inclusion or exclusion of evidence [6]. To ensure that key evidence is not missed, In this paper we provide a guide to good practice in planning, conducting and reporting the eligibility screening step for systematic reviews or systematic maps in environmental research This is based on: (1) critical consideration of the existing CEE Guidelines for Systematic

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call