Abstract
The principal purpose test (PPT) can result in the denial of treaty benefits to taxpayers. This article sets out why the application of the PPT should not prevent eligible taxpayers from initiating a request for a mutual agreement procedure (MAP) to resolve taxation or interpretation issues relating to the PPT.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
