Abstract

Background Gaps in coordination and transitions of care for liver cirrhosis contribute to high rates of hospital readmissions and inadequate quality of care. Understanding the differences in the mental models held by specialty and primary care physicians may help to identify the root causes of problems in the coordination of cirrhosis care. Aim To compare and identify differences in the mental models of cirrhosis care held by primary and specialty care physicians and nurse practitioners that may be addressed to improve coordination and transitions. Methods Cross-sectional formal elicitation of mental models using Cognitive Task Analysis. Purposive and chain-referral sampling to select family physicians (n = 8), specialists (n = 9), and cirrhosis-dedicated nurse practitioners (n = 2) across Alberta. Results Family physicians do not maintain rich mental models of cirrhosis care. They see cirrhosis patients relatively infrequently, rebuilding their mental models when required (knowledge on demand). They have reactive and patient-need-focused, rather than proactive and system-of-care, mental models. Specialists' mental models are rich but vary widely between patient-centered and task-centered and in the degree to which they incorporate responsibility for addressing system gaps. Nurse practitioners hold patient-centered mental models like specialists but take responsibility for addressing gaps in the system. Conclusions Improving the coordination of cirrhosis care will require infrastructure to design care pathways and work processes that will support family physicians' knowledge-on-demand needs, facilitate primary care-specialist relationships, and deliberately work toward building a shared mental model of responsibilities for addressing medical care and social determinants of health.

Highlights

  • Liver cirrhosis is a leading cause of morbidity and premature mortality in patients with a digestive disease [1, 2]. e decompensated stage of cirrhosis is defined by the presence of cirrhosis complications including ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, and variceal hemorrhage [3, 4]

  • Due to the infrequency of treating those living with cirrhosis, the nature of their work, and its demands, they could not maintain expertise about cirrhosis (Table 3; Illustrative Quotations: 1.1). is resulted in the need to rebuild their mental models each time they saw a new patient living with cirrhosis

  • Ere were individual differences in what family physicians included in the scope of their mental models

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Liver cirrhosis is a leading cause of morbidity and premature mortality in patients with a digestive disease [1, 2]. e decompensated stage of cirrhosis is defined by the presence of cirrhosis complications including ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, and variceal hemorrhage [3, 4]. A deeper understanding of why primary care and specialist physicians approach cirrhosis care differently, vary in their confidence levels, and perceive their roles and responsibilities is needed [18]. Understanding the differences in the mental models held by specialty and primary care physicians may help to identify the root causes of problems in the coordination of cirrhosis care. Aim. To compare and identify differences in the mental models of cirrhosis care held by primary and specialty care physicians and nurse practitioners that may be addressed to improve coordination and transitions. Improving the coordination of cirrhosis care will require infrastructure to design care pathways and work processes that will support family physicians’ knowledge-on-demand needs, facilitate primary care-specialist relationships, and deliberately work toward building a shared mental model of responsibilities for addressing medical care and social determinants of health

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.