Abstract

Mountainous regions are hotspots of terrestrial biodiversity. Unlike islands, which have been the focus of extensive research on extinction dynamics, fewer studies have examined mountain ranges even though they face increasing threats from human pressures – notably habitat conversion and climate change. Limits to the taxonomic and geographical extent and resolution of previously available information have precluded an explicit assessment of the relative role of elevational distribution in determining extinction risk. We use a new global species-level avian database to quantify the influence of elevational distribution (range, maximum and midpoint) on extinction risk in birds at the global scale. We also tested this relationship within biogeographic realms, higher taxonomic levels, and across phylogenetic contrasts. Potential confounding variables (i.e. phylogenetic, distributional, morphological, life history and niche breadth) were also tested and controlled for. We show that the three measures of elevational distribution are strong negative predictors of avian extinction risk, with elevational range comparable and complementary to that of geographical range size. Extinction risk was also found to be positively associated with body weight, development and adult survival, but negatively associated with reproduction and niche breadth. The robust and consistent findings from this study demonstrate the importance of elevational distribution as a key driver of variation in extinction dynamics in birds. Our results also highlight elevational distribution as a missing criterion in current schemes for quantifying extinction risk and setting species conservation priorities in birds. Further research is recommended to test for generality across non-avian taxa, which will require an advance in our knowledge of species’ current elevational ranges and increased efforts to digitise and centralise such data.

Highlights

  • Recent global studies of the distribution of geographical range sizes across species have shown that major mountain chains, predominately within the tropics, are the richest areas for terrestrial biodiversity (e.g. [1,2,3])

  • Species with narrower elevational ranges, lower maximum elevational limits and lower elevational midpoints are at greater risk of extinction than species with broader and higher elevational distributions

  • Partitioning species that are ‘Threatened’ (CR, EN and VU) and ‘Not-threatened’ (NT and Least Concern (LC)) shows that both number and proportion of ‘Threatened’ bird species decline with increasing elevational distribution (Figs. 2 and S2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent global studies of the distribution of geographical range sizes across species have shown that major mountain chains, predominately within the tropics, are the richest areas for terrestrial biodiversity (e.g. [1,2,3]). Recent global studies of the distribution of geographical range sizes across species have shown that major mountain chains, predominately within the tropics, are the richest areas for terrestrial biodiversity 89% of avian species richness hotspot regions are PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0121849. Analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript 89% of avian species richness hotspot regions are PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0121849 April 7, 2015

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call