Elevating the Quality of Disability and Rehabilitation Research

Abstract

With the remarkable growth of disability- and rehabilitation- related research in the past decade, it is imperative that we support the highest-quality research possible. With cuts in research funding, rehabilitation research is now under a microscope like never before, and it is critical that we put our best foot forward. To ensure the quality of the disability and rehabilitation research that is published, the 28 rehabilitation journals simultaneously publishing this editorial (see Acknowledgements) have agreed to take a more aggressive stance on the use of reporting guidelines.* Research reports must contain sufficient information to allow readers to understand how a study was designed and conducted, including variable definitions, instruments and other measures, and analytical techniques.1 For review articles, whether systematic or narrative, readers should be informed of the rationale and details behind the literature search strategy. Too often, articles fail to include their standard for inclusion and their criteria for evaluating study quality.2 As noted by Doug Altman, co-originator of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Statement and head of the Centre for Statistics in Medicine at Oxford University, “Good reporting is not an optional extra: it is an essential component of good research.”3