Abstract

Platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is a parameter reflecting inflammatory responses in patients with cancer. Several studies have investigated the prognostic value of PLR in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC); however, the results are controversial. Thus, we carried out a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between PLR and CRC prognostication. Relevant articles were retrieved through PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, and pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed by using STATA V.12.0. Both the random-effects model and fixed-effects model were utilized. A total of 13 studies (14 cohorts) with 8,601 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled HRs and 95% CIs demonstrated that increased PLR predicted poor overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.81, 95%CI:1.42–2.31, p<0.001; I2 = 65%, Ph = 0.002), disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 1.84, 95%CI:1.22–2.76, p = 0.003; I2 = 78.3%, Ph<0.001) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR = 1.84, 95%CI:1.41–2.41, p<0.001; I2 = 0, Ph = 0.686), although this was not the case for cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR = 1.75, 95%CI:0.59–5.17, p = 0.309; I2 = 66.2%, Ph = 0.085) or time to recurrence (TTR) (HR = 1.21 95%CI:0.62–2.36, p = 0.573;I2 = 58.4%, Ph = 0.121). Subgroup analysis showed that PLR enhanced the prognostic value for OS in Caucasian patients, in small sample studies and for metastatic disease; however, this was not the case with rectal cancer. Furthermore, elevated PLR predicted reduced DFS in Caucasians and not in Asians. In conclusion, our meta-analysis showed that high PLR was a significant biomarker for poor OS, DFS, and RFS in patients with CRC; however, it had no association with CSS or TTR.

Highlights

  • Colorectal cancer (CRC) is ranked as the third most commonly diagnosed cancer type and the fourth most frequent cause of cancer-related deaths around the world[1]

  • Pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) demonstrated that increased Platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) predicted poor overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.81, 95%CI:1.42–2.31, p

  • Our meta-analysis showed that high PLR was a significant biomarker for poor OS, DFS, and RFS in patients with CRC; it had no association with CSS or TTR

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is ranked as the third most commonly diagnosed cancer type and the fourth most frequent cause of cancer-related deaths around the world[1]. In the United States, CRC accounts for 8% of new cancer cases and 8% of cancer deaths in men and women[2]. Significant progress has been achieved in the past two decades to improve the clinical outcomes of PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0163523. CRC, including the approval of several therapeutic agents for chemotherapy and targeted therapy [3].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call