Abstract
Elena Dugan’s book, The Apocalypse of the Birds: 1 Enoch and the Jewish Revolt Against Rome, seeks to overturn the prevailing scholarly consensus that the “Animal Apocalypse” (1 En. 85–90) is a unified work, written at the time of the Maccabean revolt or shortly thereafter. She argues that it is two works and that the second part, called by her “The Apocalypse of the Birds,” was written in the latter ‘60s C.E. It does not describe the Maccabean revolt, but the “first Jewish revolt” against Rome and the defeat of Cestius Gallus in 66 C.E. She points out that the latter part of the “Animal Apocalypse” is not attested at Qumran, and she tries to show on literary grounds that the work has two parts. She further points to many alleged deficiencies in the “Maccabean hypothesis” and strengths in her “Roman hypothesis.” This review constitutes a detailed rebuttal to Dugan’s book by a representative of the “Maccabean hypothesis.” It also makes a new and original case for an allusion to the “Animal Apocalypse” in Jubilees 4:19, something Dugan denies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.