Abstract
Although clinicians and researchers are increasingly interested in understanding mental health, the systematic study of resiliency presents unique problems. Constructs of mental health have been used in epidemiologic, population-based studies of wellness. Sociability, self-efficacy, and a sense of meaning appear to be common attributes of resilient people. These attributes seem to benefit individuals over time and despite hardships. Yet research that identifies particularly resilient cohorts may have limited generalizability. Furthermore, constructs of mental health may not capture the variety and dynamism of adaptive coping. Person-centered research methods such as psychoanalytic case studies and ethnographies can supplement population-based studies of resiliency with valuable context and detail. Examples are given of narrative-based studies of resiliency.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.