Abstract

The biological oxidation of elemental sulfur (S0) to sulfate and the reduction of S0 to sulfide provide a potential route for extracting and reclaiming phosphorus (P) from anaerobically digested sludge (ADS). However, the treatment performance, stability, and cost-effectiveness of the two opposing bioprocesses based on S° for selective P recovery from ADS remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the roles of S0-oxidizing bacteria (S0OB) and S0-reducing bacteria (S0RB) in liberating insoluble P from ADS through single-batch and consecutive multibatch experiments. Changes in P speciation in the sludge during the biological extraction processes were analyzed by using complementary sequential extraction and P X-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy. Results showed that S0OB treatment extracted more phosphate from the sludge compared with S0RB treatment, but it also released a considerable amount of metal cations (e.g., heavy metals, Mg2+, Al3+, Ca2+) and negatively affected sludge dewaterability due to intense sludge acidification and cell lysis. At pH 1.2, the S0OB treatment released 92.9% of P from the sludge, with the dissolution of HAP, Fe-PO4, Mg3(PO4)2, and P-fehrrihy contributing 26.8%, 22.1%, 12.8%, and 10.5%, respectively. The S0RB treatment released 63.6% of P from the sludge at pH 7.0, with negligible dissolution of metal cations, thereby avoiding costly purification of the extract and alkali neutralization for pH adjustment. This treatment involved the replacement of phosphates bounded with Fe-PO4 (FePO4 and P-fehrrihy) and Al–PO4 (P-Alumina and AlPO4) with biogenic sulfides, with contributions of 72.7%, and 20.9%, respectively. Consecutive bioprocesses for P extraction were achieved by recirculating the treated sludge. Both S0OB and S0RB treatments did not affect the extent of sludge dewatering but considerably weakened the dewatering rate. The S0OB-treated sludge exhibited prolonged filtration time (from 3010 s to 9150 s) and expressing time (from 795 s to 4690 s) during compression dewatering. After removing metal cations using cation exchange resin (CER) and neutralizing using NaOH, a vivianite product Fe3(PO4)2·8H2O (purity: 84%) was harvested from the S0OB-treated extract through precipitation with FeSO4·7H2O. By contrast, a vivianite product Fe3(PO4)2·8H2O (purity: 81%) was directly obtained from the S0RB-treated extract through precipitation with FeSO4·7H2O. Ultimately, 79.8 and 57.9wt% of P were recovered from ADS through S0OB extraction–CER purification–alkali neutralization–vivianite crystallization, and S0RB extraction–vivianite crystallization, respectively. Collectively, biological S0 reduction is more applicable than biological S0 oxidation for selectively reclaiming P from Fe/Al-associated phosphate-rich ADS due to better cost-effectiveness and process simplicity. These findings are of significance for developing sludge management strategies to improve P reclamation with minimal process inputs.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call