Abstract
Electrosurgery is used to achieve hemostasis during surgery. There are no studies exploring the effects of the use or avoidance of electrodessication during Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) repair. Given the growing concerns for tissue aerosolization, occupational smoke exposure, and spread of infectious diseases, it is important to determine the importance of electrical hemostasis. In this retrospective study, electronic medical records of a single, tertiary, academic dermatology practice were reviewed. All MMS cases that underwent surgical repair from January 1 to December 31, 2019, by 2 dermatologic surgeons (one who used electrodessication during repair and one who did not) were included. Patient demographic data, information regarding the procedures, and complications occurring 90 days after MMS were recorded. One hundred ninety-eight cases of MMS repair used electrodessication, whereas 193 cases did not. There was no significant difference in the demographic makeup, MMS procedure, or 90-day complication rates between the 2 groups. No major adverse events were MMS-related. The use or avoidance of electrodessication during MMS repair was not associated with increased 90-day postoperative complications, suggesting that a greater tolerance of moderate oozing at a surgical site during MMS repair is reasonable to minimize electrosurgical tissue damage and occupational smoke exposure.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
