Abstract

AbstractElectrostatic models frequently proposed to describe ion–molecule interactions have been tested on the adducts formed by Group 1 and 2 cations with H2O, NH3, H2S, PH3, their methyl analogs, and their anions. The results from the model calculations were compared with all‐electron calculations (geometry optimized, MP2, TZP basis sets) carried out on adducts formed with Li+, Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+. The electrostatic potential model was utilized in two ways: The attraction of the point charge was calculated with and without relaxation of the ligand. A third model allowed relaxation of the ligand but treated the cation as a frozen core. The final model was the crude point charge/point dipole approximation. At long range, the models satisfactorily track the effects on energy of gross changes in the ion–ligand interaction (monovalent versus divalent ions, neutral ligands versus anions, parent ligands versus methyl derivatives), but correlation at close range is poor, especially for binding by divalent cations. The hypothesis that the calculated strength of cation–dipole binding is dependent on calculated dipole moment could not be verified. © 1995 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.