Abstract

A widely held assumption is that memory retrieval is aided by cognitive control processes that are engaged flexibly in service of memory retrieval and memory decisions. While there is some empirical support for this view, a notable exception is the absence of evidence for the flexible use of retrieval control in functional neuroimaging experiments requiring frequent switches between tasks with different cognitive demands. This absence is troublesome in so far as frequent switches between tasks mimic some of the challenges that are typically placed on memory outside the laboratory. In this experiment we instructed participants to alternate frequently between three episodic memory tasks requiring item recognition or retrieval of one of two different kinds of contextual information encoded in a prior study phase (screen location or encoding task). Event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by unstudied items in the two tasks requiring retrieval of study context were reliably different, demonstrating for the first time that ERPs index task-specific processing of retrieval cues when retrieval goals change frequently. The inclusion of the item recognition task was a novel and important addition in this study, because only the ERPs elicited by unstudied items in one of the two context conditions diverged from those in the item recognition condition. This outcome constrains functional interpretations of the differences that emerged between the two context conditions and emphasises the utility of this baseline in functional imaging studies of retrieval processing operations.

Highlights

  • Episodic memory allows us to navigate our personal past and to recollect detailed information about specific events

  • These outcomes suggest that the Event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by different preparatory cues should diverge in this experiment, and if this is accompanied by divergences between the ERPs elicited by new test items, it would offer – for the first time – an opportunity to consider the correspondence between neural signatures of two classes of process linked to retrieval orientations: those engaged during their adoption, and those that are a consequence of an orientation having been adopted

  • For the first time significant differences were found between ERPs elicited by Correct Rejections across retrieval tasks between which frequent switches were required

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Episodic memory allows us to navigate our personal past and to recollect detailed information about specific events. In direct contrast with the circumstances under which ERPs elicited by correct rejections have tended to differ, divergences between the ERPs elicited by these cues have been observed when retrieval tasks vary frequently, and not when retrieval tasks are blocked (Herron and Wilding, 2006) These outcomes suggest that the ERPs elicited by different preparatory cues should diverge in this experiment, and if this is accompanied by divergences between the ERPs elicited by new test items, it would offer – for the first time – an opportunity to consider the correspondence between neural signatures of two classes of process linked to retrieval orientations: those engaged during their adoption, and those that are a consequence of an orientation having been adopted

Participants
Design
Procedure
Results
Discussion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.