Abstract
Response times (RTs) can provide valuable information about a person’s underlying decision processes. To investigate electrophysiological correlates of integrating choice and RTs, ERPs elicited by belief updating in long response times condition (Long-RTs) were compared with those in short response times condition (Short-RTs). In both kinds of conditions, three fictitious persons were arranged in random order (P1, P2, P3) and predicted uncertain state of world. P3 took a long time in Long-RTs condition. In Short-RTs condition P3 rapidly made decisions. Participants’ task was to infer P3’s private signal after observing three fictitious persons’ same choice and P3’s RTs. ERP results revealed that frontal P200 and N200 distinguished between the two conditions. P200 showed a higher amplitude in Short-RTs condition and might represent early stage valuations of task-relevant perceptual information. N200 showed a more negative amplitude in Long-RTs condition and might reflect conflict between participants’ prior knowledge about P3’s private signal and P3’s long RTs. Our study demonstrates that RTs is an indicator of choice and identifies the temporal process of integrating choice and response time during sequential decision making.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
