Abstract

A severe brain injury may lead to a disorder of consciousness (DOC) such as coma, vegetative state (VS), minimally conscious state (MCS) or locked-in syndrome (LIS). Till date, the diagnosis of DOC relies only on clinical evaluation or subjective scoring systems such as Glasgow coma scale, which fails to detect subtle changes and thereby results in diagnostic errors. The high rate of misdiagnosis and inability to predict the recovery of consciousness for DOC patients have created a huge research interest in the assessment of consciousness. Researchers have explored the use of various stimulation and neuroimaging techniques to improve the diagnosis. In this article, we present the important findings of resting-state as well as sensory stimulation methods and highlight the stimuli proven to be successful in the assessment of consciousness. Primarily, we review the literature based on (a) application/non-use of stimuli (i.e., sensory stimulation/resting state-based), (b) type of stimulation used (i.e., auditory, visual, tactile, olfactory, or mental-imagery), (c) electrophysiological signal used (EEG/ERP, fMRI, PET, EMG, SCL, or ECG). Among the sensory stimulation methods, auditory stimulation has been extensively used, since it is easier to conduct for these patients. Olfactory and tactile stimulation have been less explored and need further research. Emotionally charged stimuli such as subject’s own name or narratives in a familiar voice or subject’s own face/family pictures or music result in stronger responses than neutral stimuli. Studies based on resting state analysis have employed measures like complexity, power spectral features, entropy and functional connectivity patterns to distinguish between the VS and MCS patients. Resting-state EEG and fMRI are the state-of-the-art techniques and have a huge potential in predicting the recovery of coma patients. Further, EMG and mental-imagery based studies attempt to obtain volitional responses from the VS patients and thus could detect their command-following capability. This may provide an effective means to communicate with these patients. Recent studies have employed fMRI and PET to understand the brain-activation patterns corresponding to the mental imagery. This review promotes our knowledge about the techniques used for the diagnosis of patients with DOC and attempts to provide ideas for future research.

Highlights

  • The word ‘consciousness’ has different connotations, depending upon the domain of discussion

  • This paper presents a review of various studies that have aimed to assess the level of consciousness of disorder of consciousness (DOC) patients, using different techniques including EEG, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), positron emission tomography (PET), EMG

  • They found that the activation type and volume in the auditory cortex elicited by s own name (SON)-familiar voice (FV) significantly correlated with the prognosis of vegetative state (VS) patients, with traumatic etiology

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The word ‘consciousness’ has different connotations, depending upon the domain of discussion. Consciousness is described as consisting of two major components, namely arousal (eye-opening) and awareness (nonreflexive behavior or command following ability). Arousal is generally assessed by examining the presence of spontaneous or stimulus-induced eye opening, while the behavioral assessment of awareness relies on discriminating between automatic movements and response to commands or non-reflex actions (Guldenmund et al, 2012). Patients in VS/UWS (Laureys et al, 2010) recover arousal systems, marked by the opening of eyes, but remain unresponsive to external stimuli and unaware of self and surroundings (Laureys and Boly, 2008). MCS patients may show some signs of consciousness (though fluctuating) by non-reflex behaviors. Patients in this state display limited, but clear evidence of self or surrounding awareness (Laureys et al, 2004). They display a level of consciousness similar to that of the healthy people (Bodart et al, 2013)

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call