Abstract

Substantia gelatinosa (SG) neurons, which are located in the spinal dorsal horn (lamina II), have been identified as the “central gate” for the transmission and modulation of nociceptive information. Rebound depolarization (RD), a biophysical property mediated by membrane hyperpolarization that is frequently recorded in the central nervous system, contributes to shaping neuronal intrinsic excitability and, in turn, contributes to neuronal output and network function. However, the electrophysiological and morphological properties of SG neurons exhibiting RD remain unclarified. In this study, whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were performed on SG neurons from parasagittal spinal cord slices. RD was detected in 44.44% (84 out of 189) of the SG neurons recorded. We found that RD-expressing neurons had more depolarized resting membrane potentials, more hyperpolarized action potential (AP) thresholds, higher AP amplitudes, shorter AP durations, and higher spike frequencies in response to depolarizing current injection than neurons without RD. Based on their firing patterns and morphological characteristics, we propose that most of the SG neurons with RD mainly displayed tonic firing (69.05%) and corresponded to islet cell morphology (58.82%). Meanwhile, subthreshold currents, including the hyperpolarization-activated cation current (Ih) and T-type calcium current (IT), were identified in SG neurons with RD. Blockage of Ih delayed the onset of the first spike in RD, while abolishment of IT significantly blunted the amplitude of RD. Regarding synaptic inputs, SG neurons with RD showed lower frequencies in both spontaneous and miniature excitatory synaptic currents. Furthermore, RD-expressing neurons received either Aδ- or C-afferent-mediated monosynaptic and polysynaptic inputs. However, RD-lacking neurons received afferents from monosynaptic and polysynaptic Aδ fibers and predominantly polysynaptic C-fibers. These findings demonstrate that SG neurons with RD have a specific cell-type distribution, and may differentially process somatosensory information compared to those without RD.

Highlights

  • MATERIALS AND METHODSRebound depolarization (RD) is a transient membrane depolarization following hyperpolarizing pulses

  • Neurons were morphologically grouped on the basis of the following parameters regarding their dendritic arborizations (RC: rostro-caudal extent of dentrites, DV: dorsalventral expansion of dendrites, SR, SC, SD, SV: dendrites spread from center of the soma to rostral, caudal, dorsal and ventral limit, respectively) (Grudt and Perl, 2002; Yasaka et al, 2007)

  • A total of 189 Substantia gelatinosa (SG) neurons were recorded from parasagittal spinal cord slices of SD rats

Read more

Summary

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Rebound depolarization (RD) is a transient membrane depolarization (sometimes accompanied by a series of spikes) following hyperpolarizing pulses. Whether SG neurons with RD display distinct morphological features, intrinsic electrophysiological properties, and input of afferent fibers has not yet been well studied. A hyperpolarizing voltage step was used to estimate the input resistance (Rin) of the tested SG neuron, while negative current pulses (−120 and −140 pA, 1 s) were applied to generate RD responses. Neurons were morphologically grouped on the basis of the following parameters regarding their dendritic arborizations (RC: rostro-caudal extent of dentrites, DV: dorsalventral expansion of dendrites, SR, SC, SD, SV: dendrites spread from center of the soma to rostral, caudal, dorsal and ventral limit, respectively) (Grudt and Perl, 2002; Yasaka et al, 2007).

RESULTS
DISCUSSION
ETHICS STATEMENT
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call