Electrophysiologic effects and efficacy of cibenzoline in patients with supraventricular tachycardia.

Abstract

Electrophysiologic effects of intravenous (i.v.) cibenzoline were evaluated in 18 patients with accessory pathways or dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathways (12 men and 6 women with a mean age of 44 +/- 18 years). Twelve patients had accessory AV pathways, including 6 patients with a manifest accessory pathway. Six patients had AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Electrophysiologic studies were performed before and after cibenzoline (1.4 mg/kg i.v.) infusion for 5 min. Sinus cycle length did not change significantly after cibenzoline administration. Cibenzoline increased both the AH (85 +/- 20 vs. 91 +/- 21 ms, p less than 0.05) and HV intervals (41 +/- 10 ms vs. 53 +/- 11 ms, p less than 0.001). Neither the atrial nor ventricular effective refractory period (ERP) was altered by cibenzoline. Complete block in the accessory pathway occurred antegradely in 4 patients and retrogradely in 1 patient. Cibenzoline prevented induction of AV reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) in 3 of 8 patients with sustained orthodromic AVRT by abolishing retrograde accessory pathway conduction or prolonging the retrograde accessory pathway ERP. Of 5 patients who continued to have inducible AVRT before and after cibenzoline administration, the tachycardia cycle length was increased in 3, mainly due to the increase in retrograde accessory pathway conduction time. Cibenzoline prevented induction of sustained AVNRT in 4 of 5 patients by prolonging the minimum pacing cycle length, maintaining 1:1 ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction through the retrograde fast AVN pathway or shortening the antegrade fast AVN pathway ERP equal to the slow AVN pathway. In one patient who had an uncommon type of AVNRT, sustained tachycardia was induced by cibenzoline.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)