Abstract
We report first-principles calculations of the electronic and geometric structure of the (110) cross-sectional surfaces on InAs/GaSb superlattices, and compare the results with scanning tunneling microscopy images of filled electronic states. In both the predicted and measured images the InAs surfaces appear lower than GaSb, a height difference we show is caused primarily by differences in the electronic structure of the two materials. In contrast, local variations in the apparent height of surface atoms at InSb- or GaAs-like interfaces arise primarily from geometric distortions associated with local differences in bond length. Our calculated energies for atomic intermixing indicate that anion exchanges are exothermic at GaAs interfaces but endothermic at InSb interfaces. This difference may explain why GaAs interfaces are typically more disordered than InSb interfaces in these heterostructures.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.