Abstract

Two methods are used to simulate electronic structure of gallium arsenide nanocrystals. The cluster full geometrical optimization procedure which is suitable for small nanocrystals and large unit cell that simulates specific parts of larger nanocrystals preferably core part as in the present work. Because of symmetry consideration, large unit cells can reach sizes that are beyond the capabilities of first method. The two methods use ab initio Hartree-Fock and density functional theory, respectively. The results show that both energy gap and lattice constant decrease in their value as the nanocrystals grow in size. The inclusion of surface part in the first method makes valence band width wider than in large unit cell method that simulates the core part only. This is attributed to the broken symmetry and surface passivating atoms that split surface degenerate states and adds new levels inside and around the valence band. Bond length and tetrahedral angle result from full geometrical optimization indicate good convergence to the ideal zincblende structure at the centre of hydrogenated nanocrystal. This convergence supports large unit cell methodology. Existence of oxygen atoms at nanocrystal surface melts down density of states and reduces energy gap.

Highlights

  • GaAs bulk or nanocrystals are excellent materials in many electronic devices [1,2,3,4]

  • In the present work we shall investigate some properties of GaAs nanocrystals using two different ab initio methods

  • The periodic boundary condition (PBC) utility that is essential for performing large unit cell method (LUC) calculations are available to run with DFT in the Gaussian 03 program [5, 6] which is used in the present work

Read more

Summary

Introduction

GaAs bulk or nanocrystals are excellent materials in many electronic devices [1,2,3,4]. Nanocrystals of GaAs are manufactured in different methods that range from laser ablation [2] to chemical implantation [4] These nanocrystals give us the ability to maneuver many physical properties such as energy gap and lattice constant to fulfill the range of requirements of electronic devices. The first method is the usual cluster full geometrical optimization in connection with Hartree-Fock method (HF) which is one of the most accurate methods to simulate electronic structure of nanocrystals. This method is the most computationally expensive both in time and resources [5,6,7]. The periodic boundary condition (PBC) utility that is essential for performing LUC calculations are available to run with DFT in the Gaussian 03 program [5, 6] which is used in the present work

Theory
Calculations and Results
Discussion and Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call