Electronic monitoring in medication adherence measurement. Implications for dermatology.

Abstract

Poor adherence with prescribed therapy often results in decreased efficacy, annoying for patient both and physician. Negative health improvement adds extensive costs to the healthcare system. Thus, physicians need to carefully examine medication adherence before investigating possible pharmacologic reasons for drug failure or initiating alternative treatments and special diagnostic tests. Documenting medication adherence can also help with the development of new drugs and establishing optimized treatment regimens. Reliable distinction between non-adherence and nonresponse is a new issue for medicine, the pharmaceutical industry and its regulators. Investigation of adherence patterns has been established on evidence-based clinical and biostatistical research agendas. Originally, the term 'compliance' was used to describe how a patient adheres to a recommended therapy plan. Subsequently, 'compliance' has been changed to the more appropriate term 'adherence'. Several approaches to studying the relationship between medication adherence and medical outcome exist. This article provides an overview on medical adherence and methods of measuring adherence, especially electronic monitoring. Traditional methods of adherence assessment (patient interview, diaries, questionnaires, pill counts, prescription refill surveys) often do not deliver reliable data. Thus, researchers have tried to approach adherence by measuring serum drug concentrations or other biologic or chemical markers to gain more objective data. However, the state of the art for analyzing adherence is the use of electronic monitoring devices, electronic event monitors. Such devices not only provide more reliable data but also more detailed data about actual patient adherence, such as dose frequency, dose time, dose interval and dose timing--details that traditional methods do not show. Electronic monitoring shows that poor adherence, especially dosage omission or changing intervals, is more prevalent than previously recognized. The detailed adherence patterns provided by electronic monitoring show the need for a new kind of drugs. These drugs should provide good therapeutic coverage despite dosage omission and are therefore called 'forgiving pharmaceuticals'. Adherence and medical outcome have been extensively studied in patients with psychiatric disorders, hypertension and other cardiovascular disorders and most recently in patients receiving HIV/AIDS therapy. But non-adherence can be found in any medical field. Regarding the lack of equivalent studies on adherence and therapeutic efficacy in treating skin diseases, this topic should be looked at more closely in dermatology. Recalcitrant atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, tinea pedis and acne would be ideal study areas.