Electron Transfer and Charge Transfer: Twin Themes in Unifying the Mechanisms of Organic and Organometallic Reactions

Abstract

AbstractThe broad varieties of organic and organometallic reactions merge into a common unifying mechanism by considering all nucleophiles and electrophiles as electron donors (D) and electron acceptors (A), respectively. Comparison of outer‐sphere and inner‐sphere electron transfers with the aid of Marcus theory provides the thermochemical basis for the generalized free energy relationship for electron transfer (FERET) in Equation (37) and its corollaries in Equations (43) and (44) that have wide predictive applicability to electrophilic aromatic substitutions, olefin additions, organometallic cleavages, etc. The FERET is based on the conversion of the weak nucleophile–electrophile interactions extant in the ubiquitous electron donor—acceptor (EDA) precursor complex [D, A] to the radical ion pair [D⊕, A⊖], for which the free energy change can be evaluated from the charge‐transfer absorption spectra according to Mulliken theory. FERET analysis thus indicates that the charge‐transfer ion pairs [D⊕, A⊖] are energetically equivalent to the transition states for nucleophile/electrophile transformations. The behavior of such ion pairs can be directly observed immediately following the irradiation of the charge‐transfer bands of various EDA complexes with a 25‐ps laser pulse. Such studies confirm the radical ion pair [Arene⊕, NO2] as a viable intermediate in electrophilic aromatic nitration, as presented in the electron‐transfer mechanism between arenes and the nitryl cation (NO) electrophile.