Abstract

Monthly QA is recommended to verify the constancy of high‐energy electron beams generated for clinical use by linear accelerators. The tolerances are defined as 2%/2 mm in beam penetration according to AAPM task group report 142. The practical implementation is typically achieved by measuring the ratio of readings at two different depths, preferably near the depth of maximum dose and at the depth corresponding to half the dose maximum. Based on beam commissioning data, we show that the relationship between the ranges of energy ratios for different electron energies is highly nonlinear. We provide a formalism that translates measurement deviations in the reference ratios into change in beam penetration for electron energies for six Elekta (6‐18 MeV) and eight Varian (6‐22 MeV) electron beams. Experimental checks were conducted for each Elekta energy to compare calculated values with measurements, and it was shown that they are in agreement. For example, for a 6 MeV beam a deviation in the measured ionization ratio of ±15% might still be acceptable (i.e., be within ±2 mm), whereas for an 18 MeV beam the corresponding tolerance might be ±6%. These values strongly depend on the initial ratio chosen. In summary, the relationship between differences of the ionization ratio and the corresponding beam energy are derived. The findings can be translated into acceptable tolerance values for monthly QA of electron beam energies.PACS number(s): 87.55, 87.56

Highlights

  • IntroductionRecommendations for quality assurance (QA) of clinical medical linear accelerators (linacs) are provided by the AAPM task group 142 (TG-142) report,(1) which updates and in part supersedes the AAPM TG-40 report.[2] The recommended QA tests are separated into daily, monthly, and annual QA, and incorporate recommendations for the latest linac technologies and contemporary treatment techniques

  • Recommendations for quality assurance (QA) of clinical medical linear accelerators are provided by the AAPM task group 142 (TG-142) report,(1) which updates and in part supersedes the AAPM TG-40 report.[2]

  • The monthly energy constancy check for electron beams is an essential QA test that verifies that the beam energies are within acceptable clinical limits

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recommendations for quality assurance (QA) of clinical medical linear accelerators (linacs) are provided by the AAPM task group 142 (TG-142) report,(1) which updates and in part supersedes the AAPM TG-40 report.[2] The recommended QA tests are separated into daily, monthly, and annual QA, and incorporate recommendations for the latest linac technologies and contemporary treatment techniques. TG-142 specifies recommendations for the frequency of the test and acceptable tolerance values that ensure safe and accurate clinical operations. No recommendations are made to specify how the QA test should be performed and what equipment or software should be used for analysis. Due to the complexity of the TG-142 report, TG-198 was formed to provide specific procedural guidelines for performing the recommended TG-142 tests. The report, which is scheduled for release at the end of 2016, is widely anticipated by the medical physics community

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call