Abstract

Integral equation formulations are a competitive strategy in computational electromagnetics but, lamentably, are often plagued by ill-conditioning and by related numerical instabilities that can jeopardize their effectiveness in several real case scenarios. Luckily, however, it is possible to leverage effective preconditioning and regularization strategies that can cure a large majority of these problems. Not surprisingly, integral equation preconditioning is currently a quite active field of research. To give the reader a propositive overview of the state of the art, this paper will review and discuss the main advancements in the field of integral equation preconditioning in electromagnetics summarizing strengths and weaknesses of each technique. The contribution will guide the reader through the choices of the right preconditioner for a given application scenario. This will be complemented by new analyses and discussions which will provide a further and more intuitive understanding of the ill-conditioning of the electric field (EFIE), magnetic field (MFIE), and combined field integral equation (CFIE) and of the associated remedies.

Highlights

  • Integral equation formulations, solved by the boundary element method (BEM), have become a well established tool to solve scattering and radiation problems in electromagnetics [1]–[4]. What makes these schemes so suitable for electromagnetic analyses is that, differently from approaches based on differential equations such as the finite element method (FEM) or the finite-difference time-domain method (FDTD), they naturally incorporate radiation conditions without the need for artificial absorbing boundary conditions, they only set unknowns on boundary surfaces instead of discretizing the entire volume, and they are mostly free from numerical dispersion

  • This effect is related to the high-frequency breakdown in the scalar Helmholtz equation in acoustics, where both the Dirichlet problem solved with a standard combined field integral equation (CFIE) and the Neumann problem solved with a Calderón-Yukawa CFIE have condition numbers that grow as O ( 1/3) on a sphere [163], [164]

  • Among the solutions found in the literature, [162] proposes a Calderón-like preconditioning with a modified wavenumber m in the preconditioner of the electric field (EFIE) operator, an unchanged magnetic field (MFIE) is added in a CFIE fashion

Read more

Summary

Electric Field Integral Equation

To put into light the low-frequency challenges that plague the EFIE, its behavior on both the solenoidal and the nonsolenoidal subspaces must be analyzed. Quasi-Helmholtz projectors can be used to cure the different deleterious effects of the low-frequency breakdown by isolating the solenoidal and non-solenoidal parts of the system matrix, unknowns, and right-hand side and rescaling them appropriately They are an alternative to loop-star/tree decompositions that presents several advantages when compared to these schemes. From previous sections it is clear that the main drawbacks of loop-star/tree decompositions reside in their constant-infrequency, but still high, condition number and in the need to be enriched with global loop functions [67], [68] Both of these drawbacks can be overcome by the use of quasi-Helmholtz projectors, as explained above, but other schemes can alternatively be used as effective cures for one or both of the drawbacks above. For the near-field computation, the separation in jsol-qhar and in jnsol must be maintained, the static contribution removed from the Green’s function, and, in addition, the divergence of the scalar potential explicitly enforced by omitting it

Handling of the right-hand side and field computation
Magnetic Field Integral Equation
Handling of the right-hand side
Calderón Preconditioning
Alternative Strategies
Calderón-Yukawa Combined Field Integral Equation
High-Frequency Breakdown of the Calderón-Yukawa CFIE
Remedies
Ill-shaped mesh elements
Basis Functions Linear Dependency
Low-Frequency Breakdown and other Issues
Dense-Discretization Breakdown
High-Frequency Resonances
High-Frequency Breakdown
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.