Abstract
Three-dimensional porous scaffolds offer some advantages over conventional treatments for bone tissue engineering. Amongst all non-bioresorbable scaffolds, biocompatible metallic scaffolds are preferred over ceramic and polymeric scaffolds, as they can be used as electrodes with different electric field intensities (or voltages) for electric stimulation (ES). In the present work we have used a palladium-coated polymeric scaffold, generated by electroless deposition, as a bipolar electrode to electrically stimulate human osteoblast-like Saos-2 cells. Cells grown on palladium-coated polyurethane foams under ES presented higher proliferation than cells grown on foams without ES for up to 14 days. In addition, cells grown in both conditions were well adhered, with a flat appearance and a typical actin cytoskeleton distribution. However, after 28 days in culture, cells without ES were filling the entire structure, while cells under ES appeared rounded and not well adhered, a sign of cell death onset. Regarding osteoblast differentiation, ES seems to enhance the expression of early expressed genes. The results suggest that palladium-coated polyurethane foams may be good candidates for osteoblast scaffolds and demonstrate that ES enhances osteoblast proliferation up to 14 days and upregulate expression genes related to extracellular matrix formation.
Highlights
The use of three-dimensional (3D) porous scaffolds in bone tissue engineering has been introduced as a promising alternative to conventional treatment options to promote bone healing and regeneration of relatively large non-healing bone defects, as it offers some advantages over conventional treatments [1,2,3]. 3D porous scaffolds must be compliant with the following requirements to be used in bone tissue engineering: (i) open and interconnected pore network to allow cell nutrition, proliferation and migration for tissue vascularization and formation of new tissue, (ii) in vivo vascularization, (iii) biocompatibility and bioactivity/biodegradability (iv) similar mechanical properties to those of the replaced tissue (v) corrosion resistance and (vi) ease of fabrication [1,4,5]
When considering the three genes corresponding to the mineralization stage, we found that SPARC and SPP1 were more highly expressed in osteoblast grown on electrical stimulation (ES) foams than in non-stimulated ones
standard conditions (SC) and promote the expression of several genes related to extracellular matrix formation and mineralization, when compared with glass surfaces
Summary
Among the non-bioresorbable scaffolds, ceramics are the most widely studied materials as they offer a combination of high fracture toughness with good biocompatibility [6]. Their associated brittle behavior and the typically reported high stiffness may hamper their application in specific cases where a certain degree of elasticity is required. Polymers suffer from some drawbacks such as an exceedingly low elastic modulus and, in some cases, poor corrosion resistance In this framework, biocompatible metallic scaffolds offer two main advantages over ceramic and polymeric scaffolds: (i) their mechanical properties are more similar to those of the human bone and (ii) they are intrinsically conductive, which makes them interesting candidates for electrical stimulation. Several factors have to be considered like the chemical nature of the released ion (i.e., its oxidation state and complexation degree with the medium species) and dose
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
