Abstract

Electrographically confirmed seizures in preterm and term neonates were compared with respect to clinical correlates, incidence, associated brain lesions, and risk for neurologic sequelae. Over a 4-year period, 92 neonates from a neonatal intensive care unit population of 4020 admissions at a large obstetric hospital with 40,845 livebirths had electrographically confirmed seizures. Sixty-two neonates were preterm and 30 were full-term for gestational age. Chi-square calculations were used to compare the two groups. While the incidence of seizures for all neonates admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit was 2.3%, outborn neonates were more likely to have seizures than inborn neonates. Preterm neonates of < or = 30 weeks gestational age had a seizure frequency of 3.9%, which was significantly higher than that of older preterm neonates and full-term neonates. Clinical criteria contemporaneous with electrographic seizures were noted in only 28 (45%) of 62 preterm, and 16 (53%) of 30 full-term neonates. Subtle seizures coincident with electrographically confirmed seizures were the most predominant clinical type for both term and preterm neonates (71% and 68%, respectively). The distribution of clonic, myoclonic, and tonic seizures was also similar for both groups. Autonomic signs coincident with electrographically confirmed seizures (ie, blood pressure, heart rate, oxygenation, respiration changes) were more frequently observed in preterm than full-term neonates with subtle seizures; 7 (37%) of 19 compared with 1 (6%) of 16. Electrical seizures without clinical correlates were noted more frequently than electroclinical seizures for both populations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.