Abstract

Synthetic resistivity and chargeability models are employed to study the electrode array and data density effects in inversion resolution for 3D induced polarization tomography. Results from the inversion tests with different electrode arrays illustrate that the inversion resolution for electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and induced polarization tomography (IPT) data with the dipole–dipole array perform better than the pole–pole array and pole–dipole array. In addition, the anomalous bodies with high impedance and high chargeability are hard to be reconstructed. In contrast, the ones with low resistivity and high chargeability can be well established. Results from the inversion tests with different data densities illustrate that the higher data density will yield better inversion resolution for the ERT and IPT data. We firstly employ the sensitivity analysis method and depth of investigation (DOI) index method to evaluate the inversion results. Then, we present the observation-to-parameter ratio (OPR) and model-drift ratio (MDR) for discussing and evaluating the quality of the inverted maps, and the result shows that the correlation can reach to the limit when the data density reaches a certain OPR value of 44. Results from the synthetic inversion tests generally provide reference and guidance for employing the measuring electrode with a suitable arrangement and reasonable number in the field ERT and IPT surveys. Lastly, IPT method with dipole–dipole array has been employed in the mining area with the better prospect of mineral exploration northwest of Gansu Province, China. Moreover, the inverted maps reveal three ore bodies with high resolution.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call