Abstract
In recent years targeted radionuclide therapy has become a topic of great interest as a growing number of cancers can potentially be treated with radionuclides like lutetium-177 and samarium-153. To facilitate this growth and meet the demand, preparation and purification of lutetium-177 is increasing in importance. In the most common production route, enriched ytterbium-176 targets are irradiated and the produced lutetium-177 is separated from the ytterbium target material. This challenging separation is commonly performed using ion exchange resins, a method limited in scalability as the chemical similarity between ytterbium and lutetium results in poor separation at higher concentrations.An alternative method to aid the separation of lutetium from ytterbium is the electrochemical reduction of ytterbium as a change in oxidation states changes chemical properties significantly. Ytterbium has an accessible divalent state, whereas lutetium has not. However, the very negative value of the Yb(III)/Yb(II) standard reduction potential (E0= -1.04 V vs. SHE) does pose some challenges as it becomes a necessity to work in non-aqueous solvents with a very low water content. Similar research has already been performed in our group, looking into the separation of samarium-153 from europium-154, reducing europium in nitrate media, followed by a separation over TEVA resin. In this study, we investigated the reduction of ytterbium in ethylene glycol, dimethyl sulfoxide, tetrahydrofuran and N,N-dimethyl formamide by cyclic voltammetry, linear sweep voltammetry and electronic impedance spectroscopy. The influence of multiple variables such as moisture content on the reduction kinetics and stability of Yb(II) was determined and a Koutecky-Levich analysis was performed. Our results demonstrate that the reduction of ytterbium in non-aqueous solvents is feasible but attempts to perform bulk electrolysis were not successful yet. Ethylene glycol, dimethyl sulfoxide and N,N-dimethyl formamide demonstrate favorable conditions and in each solvents clear reduction and oxidation peaks were observed. It was found that the solvents do affect the peak separation, reduction potential and sensitivity to passivation. Figure 1
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.