Abstract

The cyclic voltammetry characterizing underpotential deposition (UPD) of Ag onto Au(111) varies in the literature with respect to the characteristic UPD peaks in both position and number. Rooryck et al. (1) confirmed that the discrepancy in terms of peak position, specifically the initial UPD to which a third of a monolayer of deposition is attributed, is due to a variation in the quality of the surface. Clean, smooth Au(111) surfaces yield a peak position of 0.53 V vs Ag0/Ag+, while rough disordered surfaces yield a peak position of 0.61 V vs Ag0/Ag+. Repetitive potential cycling in the UPD region resulted in a gradual shift in peak position, with time as the deposited Ag alloyed with, and was stripped from the surface leaving vacancies. We provide a methodology for tracking the rate at which UPD Ag alloys with the Au(111) surface without the use of continuous potential cycling. A simple kinetic model is developed for the surface alloying of Ag on Au(111), from which we extract an activation barrier and attempt frequency for this process. Notably, we introduce a novel technique for the inexpensive parallel fabrication of Au(111) single crystals that allowed us to build statistics and ensured reproducibility of our data.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.