Abstract

In this article we investigated the effect of different redox probes (Ru(NH3)63+, Fe(CN)63−/4−, methylene blue(MB)) on electrochemical identification of DNA single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) by chronocoulometry (CC), differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Thiol-modified probe DNA (p-DNA) and mercaptohexanol (MCH) were co-assembled on Au surface to form p-DNA/MCH mixed self-assembled monolayers (SAMs). The surface coverage of p-DNA (Гp-DNA) on Au was adjusted by changing the concentration ratio of p-DNA and MCH (Cp-DNA/CMCH = 1:100 or 1:1) for mixed assembly. The p-DNA/MCH SAMs on Au were hybridized with complementary DNA (c-DNA) or mutant DNA (m-DNA) in solution, and the SNPs sites of mutant DNA were located at up, middle and down positions of hybridized DNA duplex. Experimental results showed that DNA SNPs could be identified using Fe(CN)63−/4− or MB as the probes but using Ru(NH3)63+. Furthermore, the identification effect of DNA SNPs was closely related to Гp-DNA. DNA SNPs could be identified more easily by Fe(CN)63−/4− at lower Гp-DNA and by MB at higher Гp-DNA. However, the SNPs positions (up, middle or down) could not be identified obviously using Ru(NH3)63+, Fe(CN)63−/4− or MB.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.