Year-end Sale % OFF 
Abstract
A careful evaluation of the earlier model (1–2) for electrochemical frequency modulation (EFM) involving two sinusoidal applied potentials for the determination of corrosion parameters shows an algebraic error. Although the missing term in the original derivation appears to be insignificant, it is found that errors involved in corrosion current determination, and especially in evaluation of the Tafel slopes can be very significant, which is of consequence because of the rising popularity of this technique. The magnitude of error is found to be a function of the inherent corrosion characteristics (anodic and cathodic Tafel slopes) of the corroding material as well as the applied peak potential of the modulation. A corrected model with detailed steps showing the appropriate math is presented. In addition, using the experimental data available in the literature, the errors involved in estimating the corrosion parameters by the earlier EFM model of Bosch et al. (1–2) are evaluated. The corrected corrosion current and the Tafel slopes can be recovered from the incorrect model without the benefit of the harmonic currents, as shown in this paper. An analysis is also presented for the case of only one applied sinusoidal frequency modulation, which offers several advantages over the multiple frequency modulation.
Accepted Version
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
