Abstract
AbstractIn this work, three universally used redox probes in amperometric biosensing devices, [Fe(CN)6]3−/[Fe(CN)6]4−, Ru[(NH3)6]3+, and ferrocenedimethanol (FDM), were selected to evaluate the stability of electrochemical signals provide by the reporting systems. Studies were carried out at disposable gold screen‐printed electrode (AuSPE) biosensing platforms, commonly used for screening chemical and biological relevant biomolecules. Firstly, electrochemical combined‐surface plasmon resonance (eSPR) studies were performed to evaluated adsorption reversibility and/or formation of redox probe complexes at the bare gold surface when routinely used electrochemical techniques, namely cyclic voltammetry (CV) and square‐wave voltammetry (SWV), are recorded. Then, the results obtained were compared with those obtained at the AuSPE under the same electrochemical conditions. Based on our findings, best experimental conditions, including the type of electrochemical technique used, are speculated for each reporting system in order to improve the analytical signal stability. Finally, a methodology based on SWV technique was applied to modified electrodes to provide a simple and easy tool to ensure diffusion controlled permeability of probes thorough the films to electrode surface.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
