Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of disinfection procedures and exposure to 0.9% NaCl solution cycles during sterilization, on the electrochemical, physical and chemical properties of different stainless steel alloys used in the biomedical field. Discs of F899 XM16, F899 303, and F899 420B alloys were cleaned with enzymatic detergent followed by 20 cycles of autoclave sterilization. Electrochemical tests were performed including open circuit potential, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and potentiodynamic polarization tests in 0.9% NaCl (n=5). Surface characterization was performed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy, and surface roughness and microhardness both before and after the electrochemical test. Quantitative data were analyzed with a significance level of 5%. The corrosion current density and corrosion potential of the alloys did not present statistical differences. The capacitance values of the three oxide layers, polarization resistance, and impedance of Warburg were similar among the alloys. Considering the topography, surface roughness increased for all alloys in the post-corrosion period. The stainless steel alloys analyzed were negatively affected at the electrochemical behavior, corrosion kinetics, and surface characterization after the 0.9% NaCl solution and the autoclave sterilization cycles, confirming the need for regular exchanges of surgical instruments and drills used in medical and dental implantology.

Highlights

  • Stainless steel is mainly composed of iron (Fe) and a minimum of 11% of chromium (Cr); and may contain several other elements such as nickel (Ni), molybdenum (Mo), and manganese (Mn) (Hedberg, 2015; Sedriks, 1996; Hedberg & Wang 2013)

  • The representation of the Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data in the Nyquist diagram (Figure 3) shows that the 420B and XM16 alloys showed slight increases in the semicircular diameter of the capacitance loop compared with alloy 303

  • In the Bode diagram of impedance (Z) vs. frequency (Hz) (Figure 4), at low frequencies, high impedance values were shown by the XM16 group, while the alloys 420B and 303 exhibited reduced impedance values

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Stainless steel is mainly composed of iron (Fe) and a minimum of 11% (in wt.%) of chromium (Cr); and may contain several other elements such as nickel (Ni), molybdenum (Mo), and manganese (Mn) (Hedberg, 2015; Sedriks, 1996; Hedberg & Wang 2013). The stainless steels alloys possess mechanical properties, such as hardness and corrosion resistance, that are dependent on their chemical composition. Considering their industrial and practical application, different alloys can be applied. An inappropriate choice of the stainless steel class for manufacturing surgical instruments may favor the corrosion process, which increases the probability of loss of the function of the instruments and/or drills. The present study aims to investigate and compare the electrochemical, physical and chemical properties of three different groups of stainless steel alloys (XM16, 303, and 420B) as a function of sterilization processes including autoclaving and exposure to a saline solution (0.9% NaCl). The null hypotheses are as follows: (1) There will be no difference in the pattern and corrosion resistance among the different metal alloys in the intergroup comparison. (2) There will be no difference in the surface characterization for each of the alloys in the baseline and post-corrosion periods. (3) There will be no difference in the microhardness of each alloy in the baseline and post-corrosion periods

Methodology
Electrochemical stability Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call