Abstract

BackgroundWe compared the methods of electrocardiogram (ECG) and X‐ray localization of the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) tip position, in order to find a more convenient, practical, and safe method.ObjectiveTo investigate the value of applying electrocardiographic localization of the PICC tip position in critically ill patients with advanced cancer in Hebei Province, China.MethodEnrolled 137 advanced cancers requiring PICC placement. The position of the catheter tip was localized with the bedside electrocardiogram in real time. Then, the localization was performed using a chest X‐ray (the gold standard). The accuracy of electrocardiographic location was checked.ResultsSpecific P waves were observed in 130 patients. No change in the P waves was observed for the remaining seven patients. The age of the latter group of patients was more advanced (87.29 [5.15] years), a significant difference to that of the 130 patients with specific P waves (71.58 [14.84] years) (t = −6.704, p < .001). Specific P waves not only involve ascendance in P waves but also ascendance in QRS waves.ConclusionsThe use of an ECG to localize the PICC tip in critically ill patients with advanced cancer may replace the unnecessary use of chest X‐rays. Specific P waves not only involve an increase in P waves but also an increase in QRS waves. If there is no change in the P wave, a chest X‐ray film must be obtained. In elderly patients, because there is a possibility of catheter tip malposition, a comprehensive evaluation should be performed before surgery.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call