Abstract

Land shortage in metropolitan vicinities entails subsurface implementation of power transmission lines (PTLs) which demand structural flexibility, as well as substantial load bearing capability. Thus, development of a flexible gas insulated transmission line (FGIL) necessitates its strength degradation analysis, regarding the synergistic effect of aging and mechanical loadings. Moreover, correlation of conductor and enclosure dimensions of FGIL apropos field distribution, requires careful consideration regarding their dimensional specifications. In this research, a comprehensive electro-mechanical design is performed for the proposed flexible-thermoplastic-enclosure of a 132 kV FGIL by considering the synergistic impact of time and temperature-based aging, along with the effect of external and internal loadings, such as dead load, live load and internal gas pressure. Additionally, a recursive design algorithm for the proposed scheme regarding electro-mechanical aspects, along with aging perspectives is developed. Comparative analysis of proposed and conventional schemes regarding electro-mechanical and aging aspects revealed that the proposed enclosure exhibits the required structural strength, as well as flexibility for trenchless subsurface application of FGILs in metropolitan areas.

Highlights

  • Proliferating industrialization and urbanization has increased the load demand, which necessitates upgradation along with new installation of power transmission lines (PTLs), in order to ensure higher system reliability and stability [1,2,3,4]

  • References [34,35,36,37] suggest that flexible gas dampers insulated [20,25,31], line (FGIL)jointing is a potential candidate for the trench development and corrosion protection curtailment of complexities associated with metropolitan applications of conventional PTLs

  • Pressure rating of thermoplastic enclosure is directly related to its dimension ratio (DR) which depends upon the material characteristics like Tensile Strength (TS), density and its modulus

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Proliferating industrialization and urbanization has increased the load demand, which necessitates upgradation along with new installation of power transmission lines (PTLs), in order to ensure higher system reliability and stability [1,2,3,4]. FGIL providesa following advantages contrast to the conventional rigid as GIL: Acceleration of structural flexibility; substantially reducedin bending radius and lay length, well as lesser dampers are not required; there is no need for corrosion protection; the incorporation of structural required land area at bends. Considering the concern of enclosure’s strength degradation regarding synergistic impact of aging and mechanical loadings, this research, a flexible-thermoplastic-enclosure with significantly. Considering the concern ofinenclosure’s strength degradation regarding synergistic impact of aging and mechanical loadings, in as this research,is a flexible-thermoplastic-enclosure significantly high structural strength, as well flexibility, proposed for FGIL. HDD, and will eliminate the requirement of trench development which will result in substantial cost saving

Flexible Thermoplastic Variants
Flexibility Analysis of Polyethylene Variants
Minimum
Structural
Design
Temperature and Environmental Application Factors
Hydrostatic Design Stress
Dimension Ratio
External Diameter
Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure
Incorporation of Creep Estimations
Longitudinal Deformation Apropos of Pressure and Temperature
Buckling Resistance Consideration
Prospective External Loadings Regarding Subsurface Implementation
Compressive Stress for Subsurface Implemented Enclosure
Permissible External Pressure Regarding Underground Applications
Ring Deflection of for Subsurface Implemented Enclosure
Electrode Gap Optimization
Breakdown Voltage Determination
Electrostatic Field Concerns
Determination of MLBR
Lay Length Consideration
Design Algorithm Flow Chart
Results and Discussion
Dimensional Specification Determination
Permissible Longitudinal Variations
Wall Buckling Appraisal
Percentage Ring Deflection Appraisal
MLBR Comparison
Lay Length Comparison
Section 3.4. GIL
Safety Factor Appraisal
Dimensional
Dimensional Optimization Regarding FUF
Section 5.1.1
FieldIntensity
FUF Appraisal
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.