Abstract

The assumption that electricity consumers have no alternative but the grid for their electricity needs is currently being challenged by affordable Behind-The-Meter (BTM) technologies such as distributed PV systems and batteries. This shake-up has been well documented in liberalized power markets such as Europe, North America, and Australia. This paper looks at the regulatory implications of BTM technologies in Africa, where the power industry often follows the Single Buyer Model. Applying a game-theoretical model, we illustrate the impact of BTM technology adoption on different consumer classes under different end-user rate designs and BTM technology cost scenarios. In our analysis, we focus on the following regulatory metrics: cost efficiency, equity, and cost recovery. We find that with the increasing penetration of BTM technologies the popular volumetric increasing block tariff design leads to a regulatory trilemma between equity, the recovery of the integrated Distribution and Supply Companies’ (DISCOs) costs, and the recovery of the costs of the Single Buyer Entity, being responsible for the procurement of energy and the planning, dispatch, and the expansion of the transmission grid. We argue that it is important to transition to an end-user rate design with increased fixed charges. We propose that fixed charges be differentiated based on historical consumption, serving as a proxy for income. We offer several recommendations on how to overcome practical difficulties when implementing such charges. However, merely revising the end-user rate design might not be enough, the penetration of BTM technologies is an additional argument for wider reforms.

Highlights

  • Household adoption of solar PV has proved significant in liberalised power markets as in Europe, North America, and Australia (Lukanov and Krieger, 2019; Fraunhofer, 2020; Simshauser, 2016)

  • Second, we introduce an alternative proposal to the Increasing Block Tariff (IBT) design, the differentiated fixed charges (DFC) end-user rate design, and discuss its implications

  • 5.1 Volumetric Increasing Block Tariff (IBT) We first describe the results starting with the high-cost BTM technology scenario

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Household adoption of solar PV has proved significant in liberalised power markets as in Europe, North America, and Australia (Lukanov and Krieger, 2019; Fraunhofer, 2020; Simshauser, 2016). In Africa, the network charges, but the entire end-user electricity rate is typically regulated. Different actors under the African regulatory model, which often takes the form of a Single Buyer Model, are affected in financial terms by increased BTM technology adoption by households and might require different solutions. Not having smart meters limits the possible options for end-user rate design. Keeping in mind these important differences, in this paper we aim to answer the following two questions:. What are the regulatory implications of the increased adoption of BTM technologies under the current end-user rate design?. Can we mitigate possible concerns through an improved end-user rate design? Or are wider reforms deemed necessary?

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call