Abstract

AbstractCO2 and CH4 clathrate hydrates are of keen interest for energy and carbon cycle considerations. While both typically form on Earth as cubic structure I (sI), we find that pure CO2 hydrate exhibits over an order of magnitude higher electrical conductivity (σ) than pure CH4 hydrate at geologically relevant temperatures. The conductivity was obtained from frequency‐dependent impedance (Z) measurements made on polycrystalline CO2 hydrate (CO2·6.0 ± 0.2H2O by methods here) with 25% gas‐filled porosity, compared with CH4 hydrate (CH4·5.9H2O) formed and measured in the same apparatus and exhibiting closely matching grain characteristics. The conductivity of CO2 hydrate is 6.5 × 10−4 S/m at 273K with an activation energy (Ea) of 46.5 kJ/mol at 260–281 K, compared with ∼5 × 10−5 S/m and 34.8 kJ/m for CH4 hydrate. Equivalent circuit modeling indicates that different pathways govern conduction in CO2 versus CH4 hydrate. Results show promise for use of electromagnetic methods in monitoring CO2 hydrate formation in certain natural settings or in CO2/CH4 exchange efforts.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.