Abstract

How do disruptions in basic public service delivery shape people's perceptions of politicians and government? We offer new evidence on this question from the July 2012 blackout in India, the largest in human history. Using data from the second round of the India Human Development Survey, we compare confidence in politicians between households that were surveyed during the outage (treatment) and only days before it (control). Balance statistics show that the treatment and control groups are statistically indistinguishable, and further tests indicate that there was no disturbance to the pattern of surveying because of the outage. We find that, far from undermining public confidence in politicians, the outage increased it, as citizens reacted to the anxiety and fear created by the crisis. The results cannot be explained by attribution error, as people's confidence in irrelevant actors and institutions remains unchanged. Analysis of other survey data provides evidence for external validity. These results have troubling normative implications because they suggest that politicians reap benefits from disruptions in public service delivery, and therefore may have limited incentive to adopt measures to prevent such disruptions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.