Abstract

AbstractWe present calculations for the electric field gradients (EFG) on the Cu sites in La2CuO4, YBa2Cu3O6, and YBa2Cu3O7 using standard LDA and GGA exchange‐correlation functionals, but also by using the LDA+U method for the correlated Cu‐d electrons. LDA or GGA calculations yield proper EFGs in agreement with experiment for all sites except the planar Cu(2) site, where the theoretical EFGs are too small by a factor of 2 to 3. This happens for both the metallic (superconducting) YBa2Cu3O7 and the antiferromagnetic insulators. For the latter, these calculations also lead to a nonmagnetic and metallic solution. Application of LDA+U with various double‐counting corrections and varying values for the Hubbard parameter U gives the correct magnetic and insulating ground state and the corresponding EFGs are substantially enhanced. Best agreement with experiment is found using the LDA+U(FLL) method with U around 6 eV, because this method leaves the Cu(1) EFG unchanged, even when U is applied to its d‐states. For the metallic compound YBa2Cu3O7, the EFG results favor the presence of local magnetic moments; however, in bandstructure calculations the necessary long‐range order leads to some artifacts and should be replaced by random spin fluctuations. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2005

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.