Abstract
There exists a large literature on the problem of forecasting election results. But none of the published methods take spatial information into account, although there is clear evidence of geographic trends. To fill this gap, we use geostatistical procedures to build a spatial model of voting patterns. We test the model in three close elections and find that it outperforms rival methods in current use. We apply kriging (a spatial model) and cokriging (in a spatiotemporal model version) to improve the accuracy of election night forecasts. We compare the results with actual outcomes and also to predictions made using models that use only historical data from polling stations in previous elections. Despite the apparent volatility leading up to the three elections in our study, the use of spatial information strongly improves the accuracy of the prediction. Compared with forecasts using historical data alone, the spatiotemporal models are better whenever the proportion of counted votes in the election night tally exceeds 5%%.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.