Elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (nsclc). Results of chemotherapy and comparison with younger patients

Abstract

18505 Background: Lung cancer is increasingly diagnosed in elderly patients and is the first cause of cancer death. Treatment of this subset represents a challenge to medical oncologists. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical characteristics, co-morbidity (Charlson Index), toxicity and results of all patients ≥ 65 years (y) old, diagnosed of advanced NSCLC. We compared these results with younger patients’. Results: From January-95 to June-02, we treated 477 patients (pt), 176 ≥ 65 years, 301 < 65 y. Treatment: 177 pt, MIC (mitomycine + ifosfamide + cisplatin), 60 ≥ 65 y and 117 < 65 y; 156, CG (Cisplatin + Gemcitabine), 52 > 65 y and 104 < 65 y; 144, CP (Cisplatin + Paclitaxel), 64 ≥ 65 y and 120 < 65 y. Characteristics: median age 60 (31–78); 428 male, 49 female; ECOG 0/1/2/3: 83/312/71/5, Stage IIIA, IIIB and IV: 72/199/206, Histology: squamous carcinoma 215, adenocarcinoma 190, large cell 19, bronchioloalveolar 7, undifferentiated 45 pt. No significant differences between the two groups. Overall response rate: 39% (CR, 32.9%, PR, 6.1%), Stable disease 26.4% and Progressive disease, 26.4%. Patients ≥ 65 y: CR 5.7%, PR 45.5%, SD 23.3% and PD 18.2%. Patients < 65 y: CR 6.3% PR 25.6%, SD 28.2% and PD 31.2%. Predictive factors for response: ECOG and stage. Response rate was superior in patients ≥ 65 y and in patients ≥ 70 y. Overall survival: 38.29 weeks (w): < 65 y, 38.57 w; 65–70 y, 37.71 w and ≥ 70 y, 37 w. Multivariate analysis: ECOG, stage and sex were prognostic factors; age, histology, Charlson index and schedule treatment were not significant. Grade 3/4 episodes of toxicity: ≥ 65 y, 184/17, and < 65 y, 232/8. Treatment delays: ≥ 65 y, 115 and < 65 y, 100. Hospitalization due to toxicity: >≥ 65 y, 34 and < 65 y, 23. Treatment was stopped in 13 pt >≥ 65 y and in 7 pt < 65 y. Conclusions: Age is not a predictive factor for response to chemotherapy, neither a prognostic factor for survival. Charlson index does not seem to be useful for these patients. Although toxicity is superior, cisplatin-based schedules are safe and active. No significant financial relationships to disclose.