Elbow flexion in neonatal brachial plexus palsy: a meta-analysis of graft versus transfer.

Abstract

Functional elbow flexion recovery is one of the main goals of neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP) reconstruction. The current neurosurgical treatment options include nerve grafting and nerve transfer. The present study sought to examine the literature for comparison of functional elbow flexion recovery in NBPP following nerve grafting or nerve transfer. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA guidelines. A search was conducted on Pubmed/Medline and Cochrane for eligible studies published until November of 2018. Odd ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to compare functional elbow flexion outcomes between nerve graft and nerve transfer. A random effects model meta-analysis was conducted. A Medical Research Council (MRC) score ≥ 3 or Active Movement Scale (AMS) ≥ 5 was considered a functional recovery of elbow flexion. The present study included 194 patients from 1990 to 2015 across five observational trials. Only pediatric patients with obstetric brachial plexus injury were included. The mean patient age at surgery varied between studies from 5.7months to 11.9months and mean follow-up from 12 to 70months. No complications or cases of donor site morbidity were reported. From the included studies, 118 patients were reported with MRC or AMS scoring usable for odd ratio comparison. Functional recovery occurred with nerve transfer in 95.2% of patients (n = 59/62) and with nerve grafting in 96.4% of patients (n = 54/56). Overall, the outcomes for elbow flexion between the groups appeared similar (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.19-7.08, I2 2.9%). Comparing nerve grafting and nerve transfer for NBPP, there is no statistically significant difference in functional elbow flexion recovery.