Abstract

A common finite element modeling approach for buried pipelines is the combined use of beam and spring elements. Typical loads are soil settlements, temperature variations, internal pressures, neutral topsoil loads and traffic loads. The beam elements represent the pipeline; assemblies of spring elements represent the surrounding soil comprising an elasto-plastic bedding and friction. The choice for such finite element models is a pragmatic one. The models are relatively easy to construct and the analyses can be performed within reasonable calculation time on an average PC. From a mechanical point of view the problem of a buried pipeline subjected to subsidence, or an offshore pipeline subjected to sand waves, is of a full 3D nature. Beam elements and spring elements only partly incorporate full 3D effects. In practice the common finite element models are therefore enhanced to take into account 3D effects that would be missed otherwise. A major point is the distinction between beam action and cross sectional behavior of pipes in straight and curved sections and their mutual interaction.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.