Abstract

ABSTRACTThe present work aims to study the elastoplastic buckling, postbuckling, and failure behavior of perforated Ni/Al2O3 functionally graded material (FGM) plate with various shaped cutouts (i.e., circular, square, diamond, and elliptical) of various sizes under thermomechanical loading conditions using finite element method (FEM). The nonlinear FEM formulation is based on the first-order shear deformation theory and von Kármán’s nonlinear kinematics in which the material nonlinearity is incorporated. The nonlinear temperature-dependent thermoelastic material properties of FGM plate are varied in the thickness direction by controlling the volume fraction of the constituent materials (i.e., ceramic and metal) as per a power law, and Mori–Tanaka homogenization scheme is applied to evaluate the properties at a particular thickness coordinate of FGM. In accordance with the Tamura–Tomota–Ozawa model (TTO model), the ceramic phase of FGM is considered to be elastic, whereas the metal phase is assumed to be elastoplastic. Further, the elastoplastic analysis of FGM is assumed to follow J2 plasticity with isotropic hardening. After validating the present formulation with the results available in the literature, various numerical studies are conducted to examine the effects of material inhomogeneity, thermal loading, cutout shape, and size on the elastoplastic buckling, postbuckling, and failure behavior of perforated FGM plate. It is observed that for smaller cutout sizes, the FGM plate with square shape cutout possesses maximum value of ultimate failure load; however, for larger cutout size, the FGM plate with diamond cutout depicts highest ultimate failure load. Furthermore, for all cutout shapes, the ultimate failure load of FGM plate decreases with an increase in cutout size. It is also revealed that irrespective of shape and size of cutout, the material plastic flow has considerable effect on postbuckling path of FGM plate, and under thermomechanical loading conditions, the FGM plate shows destabilizing response after the point of maximum postbuckling strength.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call