Abstract

When using the bedded-beam model based on Winkler springs for cavity lining design, it is always difficult for engineers to select an appropriate value for the radial subgrade modulus (k) due to the lack of related theoretical research. The solutions of k for a circular tunnel proposed by Wood (1975) and Zhang et al. (2014) have been found to be applicable only when a tunnel is in elastic ground. However, a rock mass will exhibit elastic, brittle and plastic states under different stress conditions. Considering that the plastic state can effectively improve the bearing capacity and reduce the engineering cost, to investigate the radial subgrade modulus in an elastic-brittle-plastic rock mass, modified analytical solutions are derived that are compatible with a generalized nonlinear unified strength criterion. Using the maximum shear stress modulus, these solutions consider the comprehensive influences of the intermediate principal stress, the dilation characteristic and brittle plastic. Then, a comparative verification of the new solutions using a nonlinear Hoek-Brown yield criterion is conducted. The effects of the parameters are discussed in detail. The calculation results show that k is a comprehensive evaluation index for multiple factors, is significantly influenced by the geo-stress and support pressure, and increases with the geological strength index, elastic strain and Young’s modulus in the plastic zone. During cavity contraction, the intermediate principal stress improves the magnitude of k more significantly than dilation, whereas dilation has a greater effect during cavity expansion. Using the perfectly plastic model without considering brittle-plastic behaviour will lead to an overestimation of k, and using different strength criteria directly affects the timing of the plastic deformation of a rock mass. The influence of various factors should be comprehensively considered to select a reasonable radial subgrade modulus to take full advantage of the latent potentialities of a rock mass. The deep-buried diversion tunnel at the Jinping Ⅱ hydropower station is studied as an example to demonstrate the practical application of the proposed model.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.