Abstract

ABSTRACTMachine learning methods including support‐vector‐machine and deep learning are applied to facies classification problems using elastic impedances acquired from a Paleocene oil discovery in the UK Central North Sea. Both of the supervised learning approaches showed similar accuracy when predicting facies after the optimization of hyperparameters derived from well data. However, the results obtained by deep learning provided better correlation with available wells and more precise decision boundaries in cross‐plot space when compared to the support‐vector‐machine approach. Results from the support‐vector‐machine and deep learning classifications are compared against a simplified linear projection based classification and a Bayes‐based approach. Differences between the various facies classification methods are connected by not only their methodological differences but also human interactions connected to the selection of machine learning parameters. Despite the observed differences, machine learning applications, such as deep learning, have the potential to become standardized in the industry for the interpretation of amplitude versus offset cross‐plot problems, thus providing an automated facies classification approach.

Highlights

  • Machine learning applications are already becoming increasingly widespread in a variety of data-driven industries ranging from financial services to life sciences

  • Geophysical Prospecting published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers

  • This paper presents support vector machine (SVM) and deep learning (DL) facies classification examples using well-derived elastic impedances from the UK, North Sea

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Machine learning applications are already becoming increasingly widespread in a variety of data-driven industries ranging from financial services to life sciences. The data-rich environment of the oil and gas industry is becoming an advocate of this emerging technology. De-risking of exploration and development opportunities, using quantitative–interpretation driven by amplitude versus offset (AVO) workflows, is regarded as a crucial step in developing hydrocarbon resources. The quantitative nature of this work often involves the classification of facies using multiple elastic impedances and is ideally suited to machine learning algorithms. Machine learning algorithms, such as the support vector machine (SVM; Vapnik and Learner 1963; Vapnik 1995) method, have been used extensively in fields such as. Geophysical Prospecting published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.