Abstract

Seismic refraction tomography has been the primary tool to build the P-wave velocity (Vp) model of Critical Zone. Conventionally, refraction tomography searches for an optimal Vp model to fit picked first-arrival traveltimes. Full waveform inversion (FWI) has then been utilized to improve the Vp model with better resolution. However, acoustic FWI methods for processing near-surface seismic datasets do not consider shear waves that exist in the data, and even worse mistakenly handle them as leaked P-waves, generating artifacts in the Vp model. In this abstract, we present a practical elastic full waveform inversion (EFWI) procedure to characterize not only a Vp model but also a Swave velocity (Vs) model. Our practical EFWI workflow is briefly described as follows: First, we carefully window seismic data to preserve elastic waves mainly including Pwave, P-to-S (PS) converted wave, and S-wave. Second, we utilize a correlative misfit instead of the classic L2 misfit in the framework of EFWI to alleviate the interference of possible unreliable amplitudes in observed real data. Third, we perform sequential inversion of several low-pass frequency groups to avoid cycle skipping. Coherent experiments with synthetic data and the field data acquired from the Garner Run in the Susquehanna Shale Hills Critical Zone Observatory show that our EFWI approach can provide Vp & Vs models with high-resolution details.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.