Abstract
To extend the early treatment response literature, this article aims to quantify the extent of heterogeneity and describe the characteristics of treatment response trajectories in schizophrenia. Data were extracted from two double-blind, randomized clinical trials that compared amisulpride with risperidone in schizophrenia (n = 538). Available Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) administrations from baseline to Week 8 were used to assess treatment response. Trajectories were calculated with mixed-mode latent class regression modeling from which groups were derived. These groups were compared on clinical and background characteristics. At Week 8, five treatment response trajectories were identified, undifferentiated by medication received, and characterized by varied amelioration levels. Three trajectory groups (n = 414, 76.9%) showed a treatment response trend of amelioration. Of these, two trajectory groups had similar dropout rates (22%, 25%), and two did not significantly differ on BPRS % reduction (approximately 55%, approximately 58%). Trajectory Group 2 (n = 44, 8.2%) was characterized by being oldest, a 21.3 BPRS % reduction, the highest BPRS severity scores, the highest dropout rate (61.4%), and 11.8% meeting Andreasen's remission criterion. Among Trajectory Group 4 (n = 80, 14.9%) symptom reduction was considerable during the first 2 weeks and then gradual. This trajectory group was characterized by being youngest, male, suffering from paranoid schizophrenia, the lowest dropout rate (6.3%), average BPRS baseline scores, an 88.9% BPRS reduction, and 96% meeting Andreasen's remission criterion. Generally, amelioration characterizes early treatment response, such that approximately 77% are moderate responders, approximately 15% are rapid treatment responders, and approximately 8% are poor responders.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.