Abstract
This article is a reflexion on a recent Chilean Constitutional Court judgement pronounced on the constitutionality of some of the rules that modified the Law of Fisheries. To do this, our reflection will focus on the analysis and commentary of the assessment made by the Constitutional Court on two distinct issues, the first relating to the consultation procedure established by the article 6 of ILO Convention No. 169 and its scope in the Chilean legislative process, and the second, on the relationship between international law and internal law, in particular the range of international human rights treaties in the Chilean legal order.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
